National Democratic Institute Alert

The old CIA proxy, NDI, is engaging in "Nonpartisan Domestic Election Monitoring" of the illegal, military-dictatorship-legitimating Honduran elections (on behalf of the U.S. State Department & the Republican Party, Lugar in particular), which even the vice presidential candidate of the Liberal Party has now pulled out of. See below for contact information (and I encourage you to let them know what you think of their idea of "free and fair"). From their website:

Honduras has made considerable progress in building its democratic institutions since its transition from military rule in 1980, holding seven consecutive democratic elections since 1981. An active civil society has played an important role in strengthening oversight of the electoral process and other areas of governance. Nonetheless, accusations of irregularities have surrounded Honduran elections, which have been dominated by two of the country’s five parties — the National Party (Partido Nacional, PN) and the Liberal Party (Partido Liberal, PL). The 2005 presidential election highlighted shortcomings of the Honduran electoral system, particularly in the transmission of election results.

Electoral reforms passed in 2007 aim to address some of these issues, but also bring new challenges — such as decentralizing the vote count to the municipal and departmental levels.

The Supreme Electoral Tribunal (Tribunal Supremo Electoral, TSE) must now oversee the implementation of electoral reforms enacted in 2007 by the Honduran Congress, which mandate a return to a decentralized vote count that takes place at the municipal and departmental levels. Honduran analysts also note that the two major parties’ perceived control over the selection and training of poll workers raises concerns about their ability to be impartial on Election Day. These issues, combined with an outdated voter registry and delays in disbursing the funds for elections, have the potential to create conditions for perceived irregularities in the 2009 general elections.

In response to these challenges, the Institute is working to safeguard the integrity of the 2009 election process by helping nonpartisan, independent Honduran civic organizations to observe the 2008 primary elections, as well as the pre-electoral, voting and counting process in the 2009 general elections.
Nonpartisan Domestic Election Monitoring

NDI is working with nonpartisan Honduran election observation groups to promote their capacity to monitor pre-election and election-day conditions in the areas of decision-making, division of labor, project planning and outreach strategies.

NDI provided assistance to a Honduran civic group to conduct a qualitative observation of the 2008 primary elections. The group fielded observers to monitor polling stations in 16 departments across the country.

NDI is assisting a consortium of Honduran civic groups to recruit and train a national network of nonpartisan domestic observer volunteers by sharing international best practices and providing observation methodologies. The Honduran observers will monitor the quality of the November 2009 general election process and will also conduct a parallel vote tabulation (PVT or “quick count”) during the 2009 elections using a statistically random sample of polling station results.
Contact Information

For more information about these programs, use our contact form or contact:

Guatemala City
Eduardo Núñez, Resident Director
+502 2385 3344

Washington, D.C.
Sara Barker, Program Officer
(202) 728-5618

Alez Kerchner, Senior Program Assistant
(202) 728-6310

Comments

NED is an instrument of empire and cover for operatives

The NED, of which IRI is the Republican subsidiary and NDI the Democratic one, is an instrument of US interventionist foreign policy. It was founded during the Reagan administration to support his war against the poor in Central America -- to subvert the Nicaraguan revolutionary government and suppress revolution and any real reform in the rest of the region. It was continued and broadened after the Reagan era to carry out our government's anti-populist, pro-business agenda worldwide.

Given this agenda, it's been a given for the last 25 years that the IRI and NDI are both vehicles for CIA activity in the countries in which they operate.

I'm a little surprised that to see Walter Mondale cited as any kind of evidence of independence. Mondale was and remains a functionary of the cold-war liberal wing of the party, closely allied with those who aligned the labor unions with the most reactionary aspects of U.S. foreign policy and a participant of long standing in the in the interlocking directorates of the organizations that support intervention.

The fact that the UN and OAS might support particular technical election assistance pieces of the NED's network of funded groups changes nothing. As we're now seeing, even the most technical and "non-partisan" kinds of electoral support can promote a particular political agenda. The fetish with elections as the only important aspect of democratic functioning is itself a political position that's part of what the NED is about across the board; in Honduras today, it takes on an unmistakable meaning as support for the forces behind the coup.

No argument about the implication this is support for the coup

Any assistance to the elections is assistance to the coup. Most of the world plans not to recognize the elections, Panama and the US being exceptions.

And there's no question that IRI and NDI have given assistance to oligarchic forces all through Latin America and beyond.

But the entire US government loves oligarchies. They're westernized. They speak English. They talk the language of business. Someone like Evo Morales is simply too complicated for them.

The term "CIA" is used to lump together many of the empire's activities. The agencies who actually do the dirty work probably prefer that, because it makes the operation seem monolithic. But it's not monolithic. In the CIA, the analytic side has a number of people like Ray McGovern, who believe in the rule of international law. These people tend to rein in to some extent the crazies on the analytical side. But on the operations side, there are no such people.

This is why I ask the question.

Question

There's no question that they shouldn't be providing cover to the coup. But looking at the Board of Directors, it's pretty hard to see the hand of the CIA. Walter Mondale and Mario Cuomo, for example. They also claim to be nongovernmental and get funding from OAS and the UN (in addition to suspect sources like NED and State). Do you have a source on NDI's CIA affiliation?